Skip to content

Scope creep calculator

The hours you give away every week, priced out over a year. Most people are surprised.

Free, no account, nothing to install. Your numbers stay in the browser; nothing is stored.

Scope creep calculator

Revisions past what the scope included, “quick” extra requests, re-doing work after a change of mind, calls that were really new briefs, and favours you never mentioned on an invoice.

What you charge, or a project fee divided by the hours it really took.

52 minus holidays, sick days, and quiet weeks between contracts.

Unbilled work, at your own rate

$17,480

That is $17,480 a year of free work — $1,456.67 a month you earned and did not invoice.

Every week
$380
Hours a year
184
Working days
23

What that actually means

  • You worked 4.6 full 40-hour weeks this year for nothing. If you took them as holiday instead, you would finish the year with the same money in the bank.
  • Recovering even half of it — by capping revision rounds and billing the rest — is $8,740 a year. That is a rate rise you do not have to ask anyone for.
  • It is a pay cut you gave yourself: $1,456.67 a month, taken quietly, one “that’s fine, I’ll just fix it” at a time.
  • For scale: PaloWorks Pro is $19 a month, or $228 for a year at that price. The work above is 76.7× that, unbilled.

How to stop paying it

Scope creep is rarely a bad client. It is an unwritten boundary — nobody agreed where the work ended, so every request looks reasonable. Four things fix most of it.

  1. Write down the number of revision rounds

    Two rounds, three, whatever suits the work — but a number, in the scope, before you start. An unnumbered revision policy means unlimited.

  2. Define what a round is

    One consolidated set of feedback from the client, delivered at once. Otherwise five emails on five days become five rounds you did for the price of one.

  3. Price the extras before you do them

    “Happy to do that — it is outside the scope we agreed, so it would be an extra $X and add three days. Want me to go ahead?” Said before the work, it is a change order. Said after, it is an argument.

  4. Track the hours as you go

    You cannot bill what you never wrote down, and by Friday you will not remember. A running log is what turns a vague grievance into a defensible line on an invoice.

How this is calculated

4 hours × $95 = $380 a week, × 46 working weeks = $17,480. No multipliers, no assumed growth — it is your own rate applied to hours you already worked.

If anything, it is conservative: it does not count the paid work you turned down because you were busy doing this, and it does not count the projects that finished late because of it.

Continue in PaloWorks

Create a free workspace — no card to start. Nothing you typed here is sent.

Where the hours actually go

Nobody loses a project to one large unreasonable demand. It goes in twenty-minute pieces, each of which would be petty to argue about, from five reliable sources:

  • Revisions past whatever was agreed — usually because nothing was agreed, so every round is round one.
  • "While you're in there" requests: a small addition attached to feedback on something else, which is how a new deliverable enters a project without a conversation.
  • Direction changes after approval, where the work is redone and the redo is invisible on the invoice.
  • Calls that were sold as check-ins and are really unpaid consulting or new briefs.
  • Client-side delays that make you re-familiarise yourself with a project you had finished in your head three weeks ago.

The conversation that stops it

There is one sentence to learn, and the whole trick is that it comes before the work rather than after: "Happy to do that — it is outside what we scoped, so it would be an extra $X and add about three days. Want me to go ahead?"

Said in advance it is a change order and a normal commercial exchange. Said after the work is done it is a bill for a surprise, and now you are the difficult one. The words are almost identical; the timing is everything.

Two things make it easy to say. First, a written scope you can point at, so the boundary is a document rather than your mood that day. Second, saying it every time, including for small things — inconsistent boundaries teach clients that the boundary depends on how busy you sound.

Revision rounds that hold

"Two rounds of revisions" means nothing until you define a round. Write it down: a round is one consolidated set of feedback from the client, delivered at once. Without that, five emails on five days become five rounds, delivered for the price of one.

Say what happens after the included rounds, in the scope, in advance: further rounds are billed at your hourly rate, or at a fixed price per round. A client who knows round three costs $150 sends better feedback in rounds one and two. That is not a punishment — it is the mechanism that makes their feedback worth reading.

Then log the rounds as they happen. When you tell a client they are on round three, the useful version of that sentence has dates attached.

What to change in your next proposal

You do not need a new contract to stop most of this. Four lines in the next scope you send will do it:

  • A deliverables list specific enough that you could argue about it — formats, quantities, page counts, and what is explicitly not included.
  • A number of revision rounds, plus a definition of a round, plus the price of another one.
  • A timeline with client responsibilities in it: feedback within five working days, assets supplied by a date, and what happens to the schedule if they slip.
  • A line saying anything outside the above is quoted separately before it starts.

Why the number above is probably low

The calculation only counts hours you worked and did not bill. It does not count the paid project you turned down because you were busy absorbing someone else's extra round, the reputational cost of finishing late because of it, or the compounding effect of a client who learns over two years that your scope is negotiable.

It also does not count the part most freelancers feel first: not the money, but ending a good week annoyed.

Common questions

How do I estimate my unbilled hours honestly?

Take one recent project and list every task you did that was not in the original brief. Add up the hours, divide by the number of weeks the project ran, and use that. A guess made without the list is almost always lower than the list.

Is it worth charging for small extras?

Often the money matters less than the signal. Quoting a small extra teaches a client that requests have prices, which stops the next ten. You can quote it and then choose to include it — but quote it first.

What if the client says the extra work was always implied?

That is a scope document problem, and it is almost always resolved by writing the next one better rather than by winning this argument. Point at what was listed, offer to do the extra as a change order, and add an explicit "not included" section to your next proposal.

Does a retainer fix scope creep?

Only if the retainer buys a defined amount — hours, deliverables, or a scope of responsibility. An open-ended monthly fee for "whatever comes up" is scope creep with a subscription attached.

Should I show a client this number?

Not this number, which is about your whole year. But showing one client a specific, tracked list of the extra work you absorbed on their project is a reasonable and often effective conversation.

Make the boundary something you can point at

PaloWorks locks deliverables, revision rounds, timeline, and price into a link the client reads before work starts — then logs every round against it, so the extra work is on an invoice instead of in your weekend.

The other free tools